dreadful

Don't like to see vague, unjustified criticism- some more constructive feedback if you don't mind it- Some great concepts, initial ideas all sound- bit too hard to spot some of the word groups due to the obscurity of words or length left to get a handle on- may frustrate some players and cause back lash like below or low score- LOVELY theme which goes some way to making it a bit easier- the "contains letters" group was quite a feat to reverse engineer but possible if you've spotted what you're looking for. Either use it with 3 easier, themed groups or keep the letters together and in order, I'd suggest.
Really promising work, very hard and challenging, detailed and took effort. I hope you don't mind constructive criticism I just think its nice to have an explanation for why it might not score rather than just slating it. Thanks for posting do keep it up I think your ideas are good Hope you're not offended! :) xx

The two sides of the site in just two messages.
What were you hoping to achieve, xxxx? Some great revelation on the part of the compiler?
“Oh I see what he means by ‘dreadful’. Silly me.”
Knobheads can’t be banned from the site and therefore there’s a personal responsibility to refrain from being a knobhead. It’s a bit like Sweden’s handling of Covid - it requires some feckin’ sense. So get some.

If CM of this grid is the same CM who left comments on #27673 and #27674, it strikes me this is all a bit of tit-for-tat score settling and probably not worth the pile-on is it...?

oops, hang on... sorry...